11/17/2023 0 Comments Developing quad sweep![]() Russia has made a significant contribution to the recognition of how important sovereignty in the ICT environment is at the international level, and in recent years it has been more focused on the control of content transmitted across borders in the network. In addition to the internal component, digital sovereignty implies the legal entrenchment of the principle of sovereign equality of nations as regards the information and communications technology (ICT) environment in international documents in order to formalize it not only as an international legal norm, but also as a rule of law.Ī pioneer in digital sovereignty was China, where since the late 1990s a policy to protect national information space has been pursued, the Great Firewall of China being its token and practical implementation. So, this is a very broad concept, which by a number of parameters is close to categories such as “technological sovereignty” and “strategic autonomy.” Digital sovereignty implies control over the external dimension of digital infrastructure to protect against information influence and cyberattacks, the existence of an autonomous software and hardware base in the field of digital technology, developed IT sector and platform companies, as well as technologies for the production of radio- and microelectronics, routers, chips, microprocessors and semiconductors. In addition, the need to protect critical information infrastructure from potential attacks was an important impetus for strengthening the digital sovereignty. This was a watershed that led many states to revise their approach to information security, as well as spurred them to control the cross-border flows of information transmitted via social networks, in order to prevent the instigation of “color revolutions” through digital channels. In 2011 “The Arab Spring” showed the vulnerability of political regimes to external information influences. ![]() The vision of a global Internet with no state borders that characterized the 1990s and 2000s is now a thing of the past. However, as the technology grew in importance, national states realized the need to manage its development and control the national segment of digital space. Initially, the Internet was perceived as a space which is not subject to sovereignty norms and to which the notion of state borders does not apply. The same interpretation applies to the analysis of digital sovereignty enjoyed by modern states. The political concept of sovereignty, construed as power, held by a governing body without any interference from outside forces, comes from the Latin word “superanus,” which means “over” or “supreme.” Sovereignty primarily means the independence of a particular nation vis-a-vis other nations (external sovereignty), as well as its supreme authority over all powers within the national borders (internal sovereignty). Given that digital technologies are crucial to economic development, the political process, national and international security, control over their development becomes a crucial stake in global contention for supremacy. In response to the growing scale of threats to international information security, different states tend to strengthen their digital sovereignty. Meanwhile, the similarity of priorities in the field of digital sovereignty facilitates bilateral cooperation in this area and allows Russia and China to promote common approaches on global and regional platforms in a coordinated manner. China, on the other hand, views digital sovereignty as an important element of protecting economically significant digital assets from cyber threats, as well as focusing on content control within the national segment of the Internet, while at the international level China is more inclined to support Russian initiatives and, compared to Russia, is much less likely to undertake diplomatic projects in this area. Russia pays much attention to diplomatic efforts and foreign policy initiatives in the field of digital sovereignty, emphasizing international information security (IIS). The pursuit of digital sovereignty by both nations results in their making the security issues a major cornerstone, despite some differences in implementation practices. ![]() After the start of the special military operation, this policy received an additional impetus - in particular, a number of Western social networks and media outlets were banned. China is the leader and pioneer in this area, while Russia has also pursued a policy of digital sovereignty for quite some time. ![]() The mounting propensity towards conflict in the digital realm makes national states willing to strengthen their digital borders and to protect their sovereignty. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |